Token Rating: Definition, Key Factors, and Comparison of Token Rating Systems
MC² Finance Team
3 min read
Share
A study analyzing the Uniswap decentralized exchange identified over 10,000 scam tokens, suggesting that approximately 50% of tokens listed on the platform were fraudulent.
The prevalence of scam tokens shows just how important it is to have better tools to help you spot risks and make smarter choices in DeFi.
Hence, in this article, we’ll explore existing token rating systems and what a reliable evaluation framework looks like. Then, the sub-elements of this framework or “Token Authenticity Score” would be reviewed with examples.
What is a token rating?
Token ratings are like report cards for cryptocurrency or tokenized DeFi assets. A strong scoring system helps you spot safer options by analyzing specific data points like market size (how big or stable a token is), trading volume (how actively it’s traded), developer activity (showing ongoing support and development), and social presence (like verified social media profiles).
Key factors when evaluating a token?
Investing in tokens requires a deep understanding of various security, transparency, and utility metrics, such as:
Market capitalization provides insight into the size, stability, and market rank of a token by calculating its total value in circulation.
Tokens with higher market capitalizations generally indicate greater stability due to their broader distribution and liquidity.
💡 Researchers at Universidade Estadual de Maringá affirm that cryptocurrencies with larger market capitalizations tend to exhibit lower price volatility.
A large-cap token is often seen as less volatile, as price movements require significant market activity.
Conversely, tokens with low market caps can see wild price fluctuations due to smaller trading volumes and fewer holders, creating an environment more susceptible to manipulation.
Trading volume measures the activity level around a token, capturing how frequently it is bought and sold.
A token with high trading volume is typically more liquid, meaning it can be traded more easily without causing significant price impacts. High volume often suggests strong market interest and ease of trade entry or exit.
💡 A study published in the Journal of Financial Innovation found that cryptocurrencies with higher trading volumes tend to have lower bid-ask spreads, enhancing market efficiency and reducing transaction costs for investors.
Low volume, on the other hand, can signal limited interest or poor liquidity, which can lead to sharp price swings with small transactions.
Evaluating trading volume is crucial for understanding how active and resilient a token is within its market.
Number of holders
The number of unique wallet addresses holding a token speaks to its distribution and community backing.
A large and diverse holder base usually suggests a well-distributed token, reducing the risk of price manipulation by a few “whales” who might hold large quantities.
💡 Research shows that cryptocurrencies with a more dispersed ownership structure tend to exhibit lower price volatility.
Tokens with few holders are more prone to sudden price movements if a significant holder buys or sells.
Broad ownership indicates greater community trust, signaling that the token is valued by a wide array of investors rather than being heavily centralized.
Token age
Token age is a measure of time since a token’s launch and is often correlated with the asset’s stability and resilience.
Newer tokens, though full of potential, may lack a proven track record and can be more volatile. Token age, therefore, acts as an informal gauge of resilience and adoption.
💡 After analyzing over seven thousand digital currencies, researchers found that as a cryptocurrency ages, the frequency of large price variations decreases.
Older tokens with sustained growth and active use cases are typically less susceptible to hype and market volatility than their newer counterparts.
Tokens that have stood the test of time—enduring market fluctuations and competition—are often viewed as more reliable.
Developer activity refers to the frequency and quality of code contributions to a token’s ecosystem, demonstrating the ongoing support and development of the project.
A token with an active development team that consistently updates and improves its codebase is likely to have a more robust, secure, and evolving project.
A project with little to no development activity may signal abandonment, whereas active development suggests a commitment to long-term growth and security.
Platforms like GitHub showcase these contributions, providing transparency into developer engagement and the project's technical health.
Verified social media presence
Verified social media accounts, especially on platforms like Twitter and LinkedIn, add an element of transparency and legitimacy to a token.
A verified social presence ensures that investors can reliably connect with official project updates and community discussions.
💡 One study found that Musk’s tweets had a significant positive impact on Dogecoin, with price jumps of up to 16.9% following positive tweets.
Verified social accounts also allow for direct interaction with the team, building investor confidence through open and transparent communication.
On the contrary, the absence of verified social accounts may raise concerns about the token’s legitimacy and transparency, potentially deterring investors.
Centralized exchange (CEX) listing
Listing on a centralized exchange (CEX) often implies that a token has undergone stringent vetting processes for security and regulatory compliance.
Being listed on such an exchange increases a token's accessibility and can boost its trading volume and liquidity.
💡 A research analyzing the impact of exchange listings on cryptocurrency liquidity found that tokens listed on major CEXs experienced a significant boost in trading activity and market depth.
Conversely, tokens not listed on reputable CEXs may face lower visibility, reduced liquidity, and increased skepticism.
A CEX listing does signal a degree of legitimacy and reduces concerns around token security and fraud.
Blacklist status
Blacklist status helps identify tokens that may have been flagged for fraudulent or malicious activity, protecting investors from potential scams.
A token that appears on blacklists or has been associated with scams may carry significant risk, signaling a history of fraudulent or spam-like behavior.
💡 The U.S. Department of the Treasury has sanctioned certain cryptocurrency protocols, such as Tornado Cash, for their alleged involvement in money laundering activities.
By checking blacklist status, you can avoid tokens with questionable pasts, ensuring your portfolios are less exposed to bad actors or high-risk assets.
Contract verification
Contract verification refers to the public visibility and transparency of a token’s smart contract code, allowing community scrutiny.
Verified smart contracts provide investors with the assurance that the token’s underlying code is accessible and can be audited.
This transparency is essential in avoiding “black box” tokens with hidden features or vulnerabilities.
Verified contracts also help build trust, as they indicate a commitment to security, enabling developers and community members to independently verify the token’s safety.
Contract security
Contract security focuses on the reliability and safety of the token’s smart contract, which dictates the token’s functionality and transaction security.
Security measures should include re-entrancy guards, safe math operations, and permission checks to prevent unauthorized actions.
💡 One research from Michigan State and Hong Kong University highlighted that, despite efforts, many smart contracts remain vulnerable due to the rapid evolution of attack vectors and the complexity of contract code.
Furthermore, security audits by trusted firms are a key indicator of a secure contract, as they analyze the code for potential flaws or backdoors.
Trading security
Trading security encompasses the safeguards and protocols that protect investors from risks during trading activities, including unauthorized access, fraud, and manipulation.
Strong trading security involves both technical and regulatory measures that ensure investor protection.
💡 A study titled “*Security in Cryptocurrency”* highlights the critical role of combining strong technical safeguards like encryption and multi-factor authentication with strict regulatory compliance to reduce risks and protect cryptocurrency trader.
This includes features like two-factor authentication (2FA), multisig wallets, and secure API integrations for trading bots.
Additionally, exchanges and token platforms should have procedures in place to prevent wash trading, spoofing, and other forms of market manipulation.
Information security
Information security involves the safeguarding of sensitive data related to token transactions, user accounts, and personal details.
A information security protocol protects against data breaches and unauthorized access, ensuring that investor information remains confidential.
💡 A research highlights that despite advancements in security measures, data breaches continue to rise, with a significant number resulting from inadequate security protocols.
Things like data encryption, secure storage solutions, and stringent access controls are critical measures for protecting your data.
Market dynamics
The token’s market dynamics are reflected through trading volume, liquidity depth, and price action patterns.
High trading volume indicates active market participation and easier entry/exit for traders, while low volume can signal reduced interest or potential price manipulation risks.
💡 One study reveals that trading volume probability reflects the frequency of market participants’ actions, serving as a behavioral indicator.
Deep liquidity pools enable smoother transactions and price stability, whereas shallow liquidity can lead to high slippage and volatility.
Price action patterns, including support/resistance levels and trend formations, help understand market sentiment and potential future movements.
Community health
Community health is measured through active wallet addresses, developer activity, and social engagement metrics.
A growing number of active wallets suggests increasing adoption and usage of the token ecosystem.
💡 One research notes that vibrant community interactions on platforms like forums and social media contribute to the overall vitality and sustainability of cryptocurrency projects.
Strong developer activity, measured by GitHub commits and technical updates, indicates continuous project improvement and innovation.
Regular social media engagement, meaningful discussions, and growing community channels demonstrate a vibrant ecosystem. Declining metrics in these areas could signal community disengagement or project stagnation.
Potential growth
Growth potential can be assessed through partnership developments, ecosystem expansion, and adoption metrics.
New strategic partnerships and integrations indicate broader utility and market reach for the token.
💡 Algorand’s collaboration with Italy’s “Fideiussioni Digitali” initiative in 2022 aimed to reduce fraud in bank and insurance guarantees, demonstrating the token’s application in real-world financial services.
Ecosystem expansion through new features, products, or services shows project evolution and increased value proposition.
Adoption metrics, including user growth rate and transaction volumes, help predict future scaling potential. Stagnation in these areas might suggest limited growth prospects or market saturation.
Token burn rates
Token burning mechanisms play a crucial role in managing token supply and value.
When burn rates are high, the reduction in circulating supply can create upward price pressure as tokens become scarcer.
💡 The study “Would Friedman Burn your Tokens?” examines strategic token burns can comply with economic principles to enhance value by reducing inflationary pressures.
However, low burn rates maintain a larger token supply, which may limit price appreciation potential. Projects demonstrating consistent burning patterns signal a strong commitment to their deflationary model, building long-term holder confidence.
Conversely, irregular or absent burning activities might indicate insufficient focus on long-term value preservation or weak tokenomics design.
Governance participation rates
The health of a project's governance system is reflected in its participation rates.
High participation demonstrates an actively engaged community invested in the project's direction, supporting true decentralization.
💡 A study analyzing decentralized voting in DeFi smart contracts found that in protocols like Compound and Uniswap, a small number of voters held a significant portion of the voting power.
When participation drops, it often signals community disengagement or power concentration among a few large holders.
Strong voter turnout lends legitimacy to protocol changes and ensures decisions reflect the community's will.
Poor participation can lead to decisions that don’t represent the majority’s interests, potentially undermining the project’s democratic principles.
Staking ratios
Staking metrics provide insights into holder confidence and network security.
High staking ratios indicate strong belief in the project’s future and naturally reduce selling pressure as tokens are locked up.
💡 One study suggests that while higher staking ratios can enhance security by increasing the cost of attacks, they may also reduce liquidity, affecting user growth and token appreciation.
Low staking participation might suggest holders see better opportunities elsewhere or lack confidence in the project's returns. Projects with higher staking percentages typically enjoy enhanced network security and stability.
Conversely, lower staking levels can make networks more vulnerable to attacks and may indicate underlying concerns about the project's fundamentals.
Current token rating systems
5 commonly used token rating systems are compared below on how each system covers the 18 key factors essential for evaluating a token’s authenticity, security, and overall potential.
Table 1. Comparison of commonly used token rating systems.
1. TokenInsight
TokenInsight looks at the token’s market size and how much it is being traded. It also checks how active the developers are in improving the token, verifies the token’s smart contract, and assesses the safety of trading the token and how the market for the token is behaving.
The platform also considers the token’s growth potential and other factors like how the ecosystem is developing and the credentials of the team behind the token.
What it does not cover
However, TokenInsight does not look at how many people hold the token or how old the token is. It also does not verify the token’s presence on social media platforms and does not check if the token is listed on major exchanges or if it has been blacklisted for any issues.
It also overlooks aspects related to information security, the health of the community, and specific metrics like token burn rates, governance participation, and staking ratios.
Is there enough liquidity or not TokenInsight? Source: X
Overall score: 7/10
TokenInsight offers an evaluation of a token’s market size, trading activity, and security features but falls short by not addressing community engagement, social media presence, and certain security aspects.
2. Crypto Rating Council (CRC)
The Crypto Rating Council (CRC) focuses on two main things. First, it checks if a token is listed on a centralized exchange (CEX). Second, CRC looks at the blacklist status of a token to see if it has been flagged for any fraudulent or malicious activities.
What it does not cover
Still, CRC does not consider the token’s market size, how much it is being traded, or how many people hold the token. It also ignores the age of the token, how active the developers are, and the token’s presence on social media.
Additionally, CRC does not check the security of the token’s smart contracts, trading security, or information security. It also overlooks market dynamics, community health, potential growth, token burn rates, governance participation, and staking ratios.
The Crypto Rating Council (CRC) identifies whether a token is listed on major exchanges and if it has any fraud history, but as it does not assess many other critical factors, it offers only a partial evaluation.
3. Wikirating
Wikirating checks the token’s market size and also looks at how much the token is being traded. It considers whether the token is listed on centralized exchanges (CEX) and examines market dynamics to understand how the token behaves in different market conditions. Finally, Wikirating also assesses the potential growth of the token.
What it does not cover
However, Wikirating does not look at how many people hold the token or how old the token is. It also ignores the activity of the developers working on the token and whether the token has a verified presence on social media.
It also overlooks trading security, information security, and the overall health of the community around the token. Additionally, Wikirating does not consider specific metrics like token burn rates, governance participation, or staking ratios.
Wikirating does give out ratings … but overlooks community health? Source: X
Overall score: 6/10
Wikirating gives an overview of the market size, trading activity, and growth potential of a token but does not assess many other critical factors like security measures, community health, and social media presence.
4. Weiss Cryptocurrency Ratings
Weiss Cryptocurrency Ratings looks at the token’s market size to understand its value and examines how much the token is being traded to gauge its popularity. It also checks if the token is listed on major centralized exchanges (CEX) and assesses the health of the community around the token.
Weiss also examines the security measures in place for trading and information protection and analyzes how the token behaves in different market conditions together with its potential for future growth.
What it does not cover
Notably, Weiss Cryptocurrency Ratings does not consider how many people hold the token or how old the token is. The ratings also fail to see how active the developers are in improving the token or whether the token has a verified presence on social media platforms.
Weiss also does not check if the token has been blacklisted for any issues or assess specific security measures like token burn rates, governance participation, or staking ratios.
Weiss Cryptocurrency ratings aren’t that special? Source: X
Overall score: 7/10
Weiss Cryptocurrency Ratings provides an evaluation of a token’s market size, trading activity, security features, and community health; however, it misses out on important factors like the number of holders, token age, and developer activity.
5. MC² Fi Token Authenticity Score
The MC² Fi TAS evaluates a token across 18 key factors, including market size, trading activity, the number of holders, and token longevity, providing insight into its stability and trustworthiness. It assesses developer activity, verifies social media presence, checks listings on centralized exchanges, and confirms the token’s blacklist status for past fraudulent activity.
It also evaluates smart contract security, trading safety, and community engagement. Additionally, it analyzes market dynamics, token burn rates, governance participation, and staking ratios to gauge future growth potential.
What it does not cover
MC² Fi TAS does not assess compliance with U.S. securities laws or provide traditional credit ratings like Wikirating. Its focus is strictly on cryptocurrency-specific metrics.
Overall score: 9/10
MC² Fi TAS offers a comprehensive analysis, covering all major aspects of a token’s authenticity, security, and growth potential, though it lacks legal compliance and credit-rating assessments.
What it does not cover
However, MC² Fi TAS does not specifically evaluate whether a token complies with U.S. securities laws, unlike the Crypto Rating Council (CRC). It also doesn't provide a traditional credit rating like Wikirating does. Instead, it focuses on specific metrics relevant to cryptocurrencies and DeFi assets to give a detailed assessment of the token.
MC² Finance on top the token rating game? Source: X
Overall score: 9/10
MC² Fi Token Authenticity Score offers one of the most comprehensive evaluations available, covering all critical aspects of a token's authenticity, security, and potential for growth.
Conclusion
The Token Authenticity Score is just one of the comprehensive tools that MC² Finance offers to help you analyze, discuss, and invest in the decentralized finance (DeFi) space effectively.
.svg)
.svg)
